About epithelioid sarcoma (ES)

Key ES facts to help bridge your clinical understanding

Here, you can learn more about:

ES epidemiology

ES is a rare and aggressive cancer

ES is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with two subtypes: the distal (classical) type, which typically presents as a slow-growing mass in distal extremities (hands, forearms, or feet), and the proximal type, which is more aggressive and occurs in proximal limbs (pelvis, thighs, upper arms, or shoulders).1-5

<1%

ES makes up <1% of all soft tissue sarcomas1,3,4

Two male, one female head icons

It is twice as common in men 
as in women1-4

Male head icon

ES primarily affects young adult males aged 10 to 45;1 however, the age range spans from 4 to 90 years, with a median age of 271

Circular recurrence symbol

ES is an aggressive tumor:1-4
While ~50% of cases are localized at diagnosis, ES has a high recurrence rate (15%-60%) and metastasizes to distant sites in 30%-50% of patients4

ES pathophysiology

ES pathophysiology is complex, with unique differences seen across subtypes

Genetic basis

The key genetic alteration in ES is inactivation of the SMARCB1 gene, which codes for the INI1 protein.4

This inactivation usually happens through homozygous deletions or mutations, resulting in loss of INI1 protein expression.6

Cellular mechanism

Loss of INI1 protein expression drives:

  • Elevated expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins and disruption of the cell cycle.4
  • Enhanced cell survival.4
  • Ultimately, the development and progression of a tumor.4

ES tumor characteristics

Speedometer icon

An ES lesion is a slow-growing mass of epithelioid and spindle cells arranged in multiple nodules1,2,4,5

Line drawing of tissue layers in a circle

An ES tumor can arise in the dermis, subcutis, or deep fascia1,2,6

Line drawing of an ulcered lump

ES tumors may invade surrounding structures and may also cause ulceration due to their aggressive nature and proximity to the skin's surface1-3

Pathophysiological variation seen across ES subtypes

There are two ES subtypes – a more common, less aggressive distal (classical) type and a rarer, more aggressive proximal type.1-5,7

Each subtype has distinct clinical and pathophysiological features.1-5,7

Outline of human body with limbs highlighted

Distal type

Tumor location: Subcutaneous or deep dermal mass in distal extremities,4 particularly fingers and hands1-5,7

Age of onset: Typically occurs in younger patients (20-40 years)2-4,7

Sex: Male-to-female ratio of 2:11,2,4

Presentation: A superficial, slow-growing solid nodule or cluster of nodules, which may become ulcerated.4,5 As the tumor invades, it compresses tendon sheaths and neurovascular bundles, causing pain, paresthesia, and restricted movement8

Behavior: Less aggressive, with lower recurrence and metastasis rates, leading to a better prognosis and lower mortality compared with proximal ES5,7

Growth pattern: Nodular or lobular structure, surrounded by polygonal epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, creating a granuloma-like appearance.1,2,4,5,7 Central necrosis, hemorrhage, and cystic changes of nodules are common7

Outline of human body with groin and shoulder highlighted

Proximal type

Tumor location: Proximal limbs, pelvis, perineum, and genital tract1-5,7

Age of onset: Can affect older patients (20-65 years)2-4,7

Sex: Male-to-female ratio of 1.6:14

Presentation: Commonly associated with hemorrhage and necrosis; as the tumor progresses, it may be associated with site-specific symptoms, including bleeding, pain, and organ dysfunction5,9

Behavior: More aggressive than distal ES, with a higher rate of recurrence and earlier metastasis4,5,7

Growth pattern: Cellular nodules with increased cytologic pleomorphism, nuclear atypia, and rhabdoid morphology, characterized by prominent nucleoli1,2,4,5,7

ES progression

ES progression is unpredictable

The ES disease course is unpredictable, with the potential for rapid progression, extensive lymph node or distant metastasis, and a high likelihood of local recurrence.1-4

Pattern of spread

ES is locally invasive and frequently metastasizes to regional lymph nodes and distant areas of the body.1-5 ES has a unique tendency to spread through the lymphatic system, distinguishing it from other sarcomas.1,3,4

Local invasion:

ES spreads along the fascia and muscles, often leading to multiple tumor sites.3

Localized lesion growth can damage surrounding tissues, nerves, blood vessels, and bones, leading to skin, soft tissue, and skeletal destruction. This can lead to a significantly wider area of involvement than is visible at presentation.1

At diagnosis, local spread may present as multiple nodules.1,3,5

Metastasis:

ES commonly metastasizes through subdermal lymph vessels and via the bloodstream.3,10

The most common sites of metastases are the lymph nodes, lungs, bones, brain, and skin.1,3,5

Metastasis to regional lymph nodes and distant sites affects up to 50% of patients.1,11,12

Proximal-type ES has a higher risk of early metastasis and worse outcomes compared with the distal type.4,5

Recurrence:

ES is characterized by a high rate of recurrence after initial treatment. This is due to its aggressive behavior, ability to infiltrate surrounding tissues, and potential for both local and distant spread.1-5

Recurrence rates of around 40%-60% have been reported.1,12

Recurrence usually happens within 1 to 2 years but can happen at any time after treatment, making long-term monitoring essential.1,5

Proximal-type ES has higher recurrence rates and worse outcomes than the distal type.3

ES prognosis

ES has a poor prognosis1,2,4,5

ES is often fatal, with ~50% mortality.13 Post-treatment, the 5-year overall survival rate ranges from 60% to 70%.1

Factors that may affect ES survival

Tumor size, stage, depth, and location1,3,5,11,14,15
Tape measure icon

Size: Tumor size >5 cm is associated with significantly poorer overall survival than tumor size <5 cm3,11,14

5-year survival rate for patients with tumors <5 cm was 69.8%, compared with only 20% for tumors >5 cm14

The numbers 1 2 3 4 in a square

Stage: Better 5-year survival rates are seen for localized disease than regional disease (75% vs 49%, respectively)15

Negative vs positive lymph node status may predict better disease-specific survival15

Arrows pointing down through 3 layers, depicting depth

Depth: Deep axial lesions showed significantly poorer 5-year survival (43%) than superficial axial (65%), deep appendicular (73%), and superficial appendicular (78%) lesions (P<0.001)15

Human body icon

Location: Proximal type ES has a poorer prognosis than distal type, as it tends to metastasize earlier3-5,11

Presence of metastasis
Calendar icon reading 8-12

Patients with metastatic ES have a poor prognosis,15 with a median overall survival of ~8 to 12 months4

Human body with targets on arm and hip

Presence of metastases to distant sites is associated with significantly poorer overall survival15

Age at diagnosis
Two male, one female head icons

Pediatric ES tends to have a better prognosis than adult ES15

A multivariate analysis of a large database found that age <16 years predicted better disease-specific survival15

Local recurrence
Circular recurrence symbol

Local recurrence is a significant predictor of survival in ES15

Outcomes in ES may be negatively impacted by several clinical and pathological factors.1,3,5,11,14,15

Click the cards for a quick recap on important factors contributing to patient outcomes.

Tumor size

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

Tumors >5 cm are associated with increased risk of recurrence and metastasis and a poorer prognosis11

Tumor stage

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

Advanced stage ES substantially decreases survival15

Tumor depth

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

Deep-seated tumors can be more challenging to resect and are associated with a poorer prognosis15

Tumor Location

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

Tumors in deep or proximal locations are associated with increased risk of metastasis and are linked to poor outcomes15

metastasis

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

The presence of metastases at diagnosis adversely impacts survival15

Patient Age

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

ES diagnosed in older adults behaves more aggressively, and is associated with a poorer prognosis15

Recurrence

Finger tapping icon (“click”)

Open book icon

Recurrence indicates aggressive disease and is associated with worse outcomes11

    • Needs T, Fillman EP. Epithelioid sarcoma. Updated July 2, 2024. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532911/. Accessed February 2025.
    • Czarnecka AM, Sobczuk P, Kostrzanowski M, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma – from genetics to clinical practice. Cancers. 2020;12:2112.
    • Czarnecka AM. Epithelioid sarcoma. NOWOTWORY J Oncol. 2023;73:154-161.
    • Del Savio E, Maestro R. Beyond SMARCB1 Loss: Recent insights into the pathobiology of epithelioid sarcoma. Cells. 2022;11(17):2626.
    • Krotewicz M, Czarnecka AM, Błoński P, et al. Distal and proximal epithelioid sarcoma - differences in diagnosis and similarities in treatment. Oncol Clin Pract. 2024;99119.
    • Dermawan JK, Singer S, Tap WD, et al. The genetic landscape of SMARCB1 alterations in SMARCB1-deficient spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:1900-1909.
    • Li Y, Cao G, Tao X, et al. Clinicopathologic features of epithelioid sarcoma: Report of seventeen cases and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12:3042-3048.
    • Alexander L. Epithelioid sarcoma of upper extremity: Diagnostic dilemma with therapeutic challenges. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e14156.
    • Ahmad Z, Stanazai Q, Wright S, et al. Primary pleural epithelioid sarcoma of the proximal type: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(5):700-705.
    • Sobanko JF, Meijer L, Nigra TP. Epithelioid sarcoma: a review and update. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2009;2:49-54.
    • de Visscher SA, van Ginkel RJ, Wobbes T, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: Still an only surgically curable disease. Cancer. 2006;107(3):606-612.
    • Halling AC, Wollan PC, Pritchard DJ, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: a clinicopathologic review of 55 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996;71(7):636-642.
    • Grunewald TGP, Postel-Vinay S, Nakayama RT, et al. Translational aspects of epithelioid sarcoma – current consensus. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(6):1079-1092.
    • Zhang S, Jing C, Liu H, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: A single-institutional retrospective cohort study of 36 cases. J Orthop Surg. 2021;29(3):1-10.
    • Jawad MU, Extein J, Min ES, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with epithelioid sarcoma: 441 cases from the SEER database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(11):2939-2948.